|
|
:::
Home
/
Aviation Safety Promotion /
Prohibition of placing objects that will disturb
aviation safety in the vicinity of airport |
|
Notice for Prohibition of placing objects
that will disturb aviation safety in the
vicinity of airport |
|
Promulgated date: October 25, 2001
Promulgated No.: MOTC per Decree No.
Jiao-Hang-(90)-42525
Ministry of National Defense (90)
Shu-Rong-Tzu-No.-3989
Ministry of the Interior
Tai-(90)-Nei-Jing-Tzu No.-9081223 |
|
Purpose:
Announcing
the “Songshan, Taoyuan, Hsinchu, Taichung
Cing-Gang-Cyuan, Taichung Shuei-Nan,
Chiai, Tainan, Gang-Shan, Pingtung,
Kaohsiung, Hualien Jia-shan, Hualien,
Taitung Fong-Nian,
Taitung Jhih-Hang, Matsu, Kinmen,
Magong, Cimei, Wang-An, Lyudao, and Lanyu,
distance range
for the prohibition of placing objects
that will disturb aviation safety in the
vicinity of an airport”,
and is effective starting from August
15, 2001. |
|
Notice: |
|
1. Based on Article 34 and 118 of the
Civil Aviation Act. |
|
2. Objects that will disturb aviation
safety refers to kites, sky lanterns,
fireworks, remote-controlled
airplanes, balloons or other floating or
moving objects that may affect flight
safety. |
|
3.
Airports use the runway center as the
midpoint. It is prohibited to place objects
that would disturb
aviation safety within the connection
line range of the 2.6 km area on both the
left and right side of the
runway central line with an arc drawn out
at 35 degrees each on the right and left of
5 km of the radius.
Outside the connection line range,
starting from within the rectangle shaped
range (the 5 km to 10 km
extending from the runway center and the
2.6 km to 3.4 km extending from the runway
center) which is 60
meters higher, it is prohibited to place
any objects that would disturb aviation
safety (See picture below).
Security objects (diagram below). |
|
Picture
of the distance range for
prohibition of placing objects
that will disturb
aviation safety in the
vicinity of airport |
 |
|
|
4. Songshan, Taoyuan,Taichung Shuei-Nan,
Chiai, Tainan, Pingtung, Kaohsiung, Hualien,
Taitung Fong-
Nian, Matsu, Kinmen, Magong, Cimei, Wang-An,
Lyudao, and Lanyu, are under the charge of
MOTC;
Taoyuan, Hsinchu, Taichung
Cing-Gang-Cyuan, Gang-Shan, Huan-lian
Jia-shan, Taitung Jhih-Hang,
military airports are under the charge of
the Ministry of National Defense. |
|
|
|
Civil Aviation Act |
|
Article 34 |
The operator of an airport, airfield or
navigation aids may catch and kill those
animals, pigeons and other birds that have
entered any of these areas which may pose a
clear danger to aviation safety.
The raising of pigeons or releasing of any
objects that may be considered hazardous to
flight safety is prohibited within a certain
distance from the outer boundary of an
airport or airfield.
Where there is any potential threat of such
entry, appropriate measures may be
implemented at a certain distance from the
outer boundary of an airport to prevent such
entry. |
|
Article 101 |
Any person who endangers flight safety or
aviation facilities by force, threat or
other means shall be liable to imprisonment
not exceeding 7 years, detention or a fine
of up to NT$210,000.
Such person who causes damage to aircraft or
other facilities shall be subject to
imprisonment from 3 to 10 years.
Such person who causes death to another is
subject to the death penalty, imprisonment
for life or more than 10 years; subject to
imprisonment from 5 to 12 years for causing
serious injury to another.
Any person attempting to commit the crime
described in paragraph 1 shall be punished. |
|
Article 118 |
Violation of any one of the following shall
be subject to a fine from NT$300,000 to
NT$1,500,000: |
|
|
1. Violation of the provisions of paragraph
two of Article 33, paragraph 1 for failure
to make
improvement, dismantle, relocate, or to
install obstacle lights and marking within a
time limit.. |
|
|
2. Violation of the provisions of paragraph
two of Article 33-1, paragraph 1 for not
having
installed obstacle lights and marking or
maintaining the same for normal use. |
|
|
3. Violation of the provisions of
paragraph two of Article 34, paragraph 1 for
intrusion of
livestock found to have been set loose
negligently by its owner. |
|
|
4. Violation of the provisions of
paragraph two of Article 34, paragraph 2 for
raising pigeons or
releasing objects considered hazardous to
flight safety. |
|
|
5. Civil air transport industry that does
not carry all passengers away from the
airport within the
expected time limit. |
|
|
The owners concerned as referred to in
Subparagraphs 1 and 2 of the preceding
paragraph, after being fined and still not
in compliance, shall continue to be fined
until they carry out their obligations. As
referred to in Subparagraph 4,
the
operator of an airport or airfield shall
make compensation for any pigeon house
already in existence within such certain
distance prior to the said announcement if
such house is dismantled and moved within
the announced time limit. Any pigeon house
not dismantled and moved within the time
limit or re-built without proper
authorization shall be subject to compulsory
dismantling by the operator of an airport
and the Aviation Police Bureau in
conjunction with the local police
authorities without any compensation. |
|
Article 120 |
Personnel who failed to pay for the fine
subjected according to the Act will be
transferred to the court for compulsory
implementation.
|

|
|